2 Comments
User's avatar
Seth's avatar

I have read from some authors that Matthew is confusing Judges 13:5, which refers to an ascetic religious sect (the Nazirites) and not a place of birth. It is possible that Nazareth the town didn't exist until the late first century.

Expand full comment
Tanner the Humanist's avatar

It’s true that Matthew likely confused Nazirite in Judges 13:5 with Nazarene, forcing a prophecy where none existed. As for Nazareth, it was such a tiny, obscure village that no major texts mentioned it.

However, we know Nazareth existed because archaeologists uncovered houses, rock-hewn tombs, agricultural terraces, first-century pottery, household artifacts, and Jewish burial sites — along with some early Christian references.

Expand full comment